←back to thread

462 points JumpCrisscross | 5 comments | | HN request time: 0.654s | source
Show context
Refreeze5224 ◴[] No.45079571[source]
[flagged]
replies(7): >>45079637 #>>45079639 #>>45079766 #>>45080078 #>>45080308 #>>45080429 #>>45083035 #
anecdatas ◴[] No.45080308[source]
As a wealthier person (income of ~1m/year, give or take), I could not more strongly support Mamdani (no 'h' in Zohran's last name afaik). I want a candidate like him in my city to vote for.
replies(1): >>45080610 #
1. speakfreely ◴[] No.45080610[source]
If you're still measuring wealth by income, you're probably not in the bracket that is being discussed here. $1 million per year is an extremely comfortable income, but it would take 30 years of saving that, post tax, before you hit $30 million in net worth, which is the entry point for UHNW status.
replies(3): >>45080755 #>>45080834 #>>45086264 #
2. ehnto ◴[] No.45080755[source]
I do see your point, but it's highly unlikely that they are putting their wealth into a HISA for 30 years. There is likely 0 people who got to UHNW through saving money.
replies(1): >>45080781 #
3. speakfreely ◴[] No.45080781[source]
Completely agree with you. Which it why I mentioned measuring wealth by income shows a disconnect from what real wealth is.
4. wrs ◴[] No.45080834[source]
This is assuming they have to work for the $1M income. The point of having $30M is to make $1M income without doing anything.
5. anecdatas ◴[] No.45086264[source]
Totally. I'm someone who could choose to enter the capital class via purchasing rental properties or investing heavily in stocks, but I deliberately do not.

Capital class wildly different than wealthier working class. But in all honesty, bring the taxes all the way down to me at least. Anyone making a million a year could be taxed a lot more and still live comfortably. The capital class above me could afford a LOT more taxation and still live lives of unbridled luxury.