←back to thread

New research reveals longevity gains slowing, life expectancy of 100 unlikely

(lafollette.wisc.edu)
215 points XzetaU8 | 1 comments | 30 Aug 25 16:15 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
adastra22 ◴[30 Aug 25 17:42 UTC] No.45076538[source]▶
There is no physical/chemical/biological reason you can’t live indefinitely with the health and vitality of a 25-35 year old. Aging isn’t a law of nature.
replies(14): >>45076585 #>>45076593 #>>45076608 #>>45076634 #>>45076639 #>>45076658 #>>45076692 #>>45076745 #>>45076755 #>>45076774 #>>45076898 #>>45076977 #>>45082241 #>>45088125 #
SoftTalker ◴[30 Aug 25 17:49 UTC] No.45076608[source]▶
Odd then that every living thing ages and eventually dies?
replies(2): >>45076661 #>>45080170 #
conception ◴[30 Aug 25 17:54 UTC] No.45076661[source]▶
This is not true and easily countered by any sort of investigation. Lobsters, flatworms, immortal jellyfish and hydras are all believed to be immortal.

In fact we know how to live forever, control our telomeres. We know it works because cancer exists. We just can’t control it but controlled cancer is effectively immortality.

replies(4): >>45076701 #>>45076769 #>>45076982 #>>45080555 #
1. maxbond ◴[31 Aug 25 05:17 UTC] No.45080555{3}[source]▶
Lobsters die of old age when they fail to molt, become trapped in their shells, and starve. The lobster body plan does not scale indefinitely. Presumably at a certain point they'd boil in their own metabolic heat.