←back to thread

462 points JumpCrisscross | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.403s | source
Show context
johnnienaked ◴[] No.45079760[source]
Haven't tariffs been paused since they've been announced?
replies(4): >>45079846 #>>45080850 #>>45081639 #>>45083383 #
estearum ◴[] No.45079846[source]
Some of them yes, some of them no. There are now several thousand different "tax brackets" for imported items and the apparent rates on them fluctuate by the day.
replies(1): >>45079957 #
Gigachad ◴[] No.45079957[source]
Most global post offices are just suspending packages to the US because they don’t know what the price is or how to pay it.
replies(2): >>45080412 #>>45080552 #
1. johnnienaked ◴[] No.45080412[source]
Makes it hard to believe the administration's claims of hundreds of billions in revenue
replies(1): >>45080892 #
2. georgeecollins ◴[] No.45080892[source]
The best data I could find* was that tariffs Jan - Jun raised 93b in revenue (or 180b / year if it were constant- unlikely but who knows). For comparison, the 2025 deficit is $1865b, so tariffs could take a bite out of the deficit, but never come close to balancing the budget.

The most positive argument I have heard is that it would be a small consumption tax that is regressive. Small because the US doesn't really import that much compared to most global economies. It's just things we fixate on like cars or steel, which actually aren't that economically important anymore. Maybe strategically? I feel like people are trying to make economic sense of an emotional / populist policy.

* https://www.piie.com/research/piie-charts/2025/trumps-tariff...