←back to thread

215 points XzetaU8 | 5 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
adastra22 ◴[] No.45076538[source]
There is no physical/chemical/biological reason you can’t live indefinitely with the health and vitality of a 25-35 year old. Aging isn’t a law of nature.
replies(14): >>45076585 #>>45076593 #>>45076608 #>>45076634 #>>45076639 #>>45076658 #>>45076692 #>>45076745 #>>45076755 #>>45076774 #>>45076898 #>>45076977 #>>45082241 #>>45088125 #
VincentEvans ◴[] No.45076634[source]
You haven’t quite come to grips with mortality, I think.
replies(4): >>45076899 #>>45076980 #>>45080203 #>>45080451 #
JumpCrisscross ◴[] No.45076899[source]
> You haven’t quite come to grips with mortality

This is unfair, and akin to branding anyone who takes medicine as being unhinged.

There is evidence we can extend our health spans. By how much and how are open questions. And if we can actually stop aging, versus slow it down, has not been demonstrated. Some people engage with this unhealthily, just as many terminally-ill cancer patients unhealthily engage with long-shot treatment options. That doesn’t make everyone taking those treatments delusional.

I’d hope we more mature as a society than decrying real medical research that could materially increase our health spans because they’re heretical.

replies(1): >>45078741 #
1. anigbrowl ◴[] No.45078741[source]
It's the 'indefinite' part that I react negatively to. I don't have a good impression of people who are obsessed with abolishing death, as opposed to your example of maximizing quality of life (or minimizing illness) without getting too hung up on overall age.
replies(1): >>45080167 #
2. danielmarkbruce ◴[] No.45080167[source]
The person just said aging isn't a law of physics. They are right, you are the fool here.
replies(1): >>45080489 #
3. AlexandrB ◴[] No.45080489[source]
Actually they said: "Aging isn’t a law of nature." But it kind of is. Almost all biological organisms age and the ones that don't are much simpler than us. That's not to mention entropy which is both a law of physics and dictates an inescapable form of aging for the universe as a whole.
replies(1): >>45080527 #
4. danielmarkbruce ◴[] No.45080527{3}[source]
They also said there isn't a physical reason, that is often meant to mean "it isn't a law of physics".

The fact that something happens doesn't mean it's a law of anything. Cars didn't exist before we built them - no law of "no cars". People died of TB before we had a cure - no law of "TB". Same for various types of cancer.

In practice when someone says "live forever", they don't mean to imply they'll live the 10^100 (or whatever the guestimates are) years to the end of the universe. They mean they'll stop aging in the sense that we do now. Maybe we could live to 10,000 or 50,000 or whatever. You can always get hit by a bus, or get some strange disease from a bat, or whatever.

replies(1): >>45080689 #
5. ◴[] No.45080689{4}[source]