←back to thread

The GitHub website is slow on Safari

(github.com)
446 points talboren | 1 comments | 27 Aug 25 09:43 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
PedroBatista ◴[27 Aug 25 13:10 UTC] No.45039192[source]▶
The Github website is slow everywhere. It is truly a piece of shit software both in terms of performance but also UX/UI and everything in between.

It's a product of many cooks and their brilliant ideas and KPIs, a social network for devs and code being the most "brilliant" of them all. For day to day dev operations is something so mediocre even Gitlab looks like the golden standard compared to Github.

And no, the problem is not "Rails" or [ insert any other tech BS to deflect the real problems ].

replies(17): >>45039249 #>>45039365 #>>45039680 #>>45039841 #>>45040328 #>>45040430 #>>45041105 #>>45041125 #>>45041207 #>>45042280 #>>45042385 #>>45044131 #>>45046133 #>>45048521 #>>45050100 #>>45051138 #>>45062005 #
bob1029 ◴[27 Aug 25 13:14 UTC] No.45039249[source]▶
> And no, the problem is not "Rails"

The problem is they abandoned rails for react. The old SSR GitHub experience was very good. You could review massive PRs on any machine before they made the move.

replies(10): >>45039310 #>>45039407 #>>45039686 #>>45040388 #>>45041936 #>>45043631 #>>45048845 #>>45049190 #>>45051019 #>>45051373 #
Zanfa ◴[27 Aug 25 14:40 UTC] No.45040388[source]▶
I’m pretty sure they used to do syntax highlighting on the server before and it was fast. Now they send down unhighlighted text that seems to choke the browser with anything but the smallest diffs.
replies(2): >>45041029 #>>45041118 #
sidewndr46 ◴[27 Aug 25 15:27 UTC] No.45041029[source]▶
Whoever had a KPI for improving server performance and decreasing cost got their promotion that quarter, that is for sure.
replies(1): >>45042736 #
tempest_ ◴[27 Aug 25 17:50 UTC] No.45042736[source]▶
Servers cost money, the client is free (and pays you sometimes)!
replies(1): >>45047472 #
const_cast ◴[28 Aug 25 01:56 UTC] No.45047472[source]▶
The client costs money too, opportunity cost.

Which, unfortunately, cannot be measured :( so no KPIs. Darn!

Its all fun and games until you cut quality over and over so much your customers just leave. Ask Chrysler or GE. I mean they must have saved, what, billions across decades? And for free!

Well... um... not free actually, because those companies have been run into the ground, dragged through hell, revived, and then damned again.

replies(3): >>45048359 #>>45068883 #>>45078001 #
1. godelski ◴[30 Aug 25 21:06 UTC] No.45078001[source]▶

  > Which, unfortunately, cannot be measured
This is such a subtle but important thing that so many people do not understand about data analysis. It's even at the heart of things like survivor bias[0]. Your measure is always a proxy and this proxy has varying degrees of alignment with what you want to measure.

I know everyone knows the cliche "The devil is in the details" but everyone seems to continually make these mistakes because nuance is hard. But then again what is a cliche if not words of wisdom that everyone can recite but fail to follow?

  > Its all fun and games until you cut quality over and over so much your customers just leave.
The alternative is you develop a Lemon Market. Which is a terrible situation for all parties involved. Short term profits might be up but these are at the loss of much higher long term rewards.

[0] You infer where the downed planes were shot through the measures you can make on recovered planes. But that is very different than measuring where downed planes were shot. You can't just take the inverse of the returned planes and know where to add plating from there.