←back to thread

214 points ksec | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.205s | source
Show context
sevg ◴[] No.45076556[source]
Is it just me or does Kent seem self-destructively glued to his own idea of how kernel development should work?

I don’t doubt that people on all sides have made mis-steps, but from the outside it mostly just seems like Kent doesn’t want to play by the rules (despite having been given years of patience).

replies(5): >>45077241 #>>45077371 #>>45077492 #>>45077724 #>>45080172 #
ajb ◴[] No.45077371[source]
I think Kent is in the wrong here, but it really doesn't help that the kernel people from Linus on down are seemingly unable to explain the problem, and instead resort to playground insults. Apart from being unprofessional and making for a hostile work environment, it doesn't really communicate why Kent's actions are problematic, so I've some sympathy for his not believing that they are.
replies(4): >>45077463 #>>45077573 #>>45077673 #>>45084091 #
1. arp242 ◴[] No.45077673[source]
People have explaining things, at great length, many times. Many of these have been posted to HN before, either as submissions or comments.

Kent just does not listen. Every time the discussion starts from the top. Even if you do agree on some compromise, in a month or two he'll just do the same thing again and all the same arguments start again.

You can't expect people to detail about four or five years of context in every single engagement for the benefit of interested 3rd parties like you or me.