←back to thread

317 points rguiscard | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
rootsudo ◴[] No.45074426[source]
Many Americans such as myself had Nokia cell phones.. they were ubiqitious in USA culture... so I don't get the American jab at all, the only real competitor between 95-2005'ish was Motorola. Blackberry came from that time, and then android around 2010'ish but I would say yes - Nokia was the main phone for over a decade IMO.
replies(5): >>45074530 #>>45074819 #>>45075212 #>>45075981 #>>45079339 #
runarberg ◴[] No.45075212[source]
The Nokia branding is now owned by HMD Global, who recently announced they would stop selling Nokia smartphones.

I carry a Nokia smartphone as my main phone (G400) and I personally love it. It is really a no-nonsense kind of phone, they kept the headphone jack (which I use almost every day) it even comes with a charger, and it is one of the more affordable smartphones out there.

I really don’t understand what kind of a business decisions it is to own such a legendary brand with such as a rich and successful history and not use it.

replies(1): >>45076249 #
behnamoh ◴[] No.45076249[source]
> I really don’t understand what kind of a business decisions it is to own such a legendary brand with such as a rich and successful history and not use it.

I bet $1000 that's mostly due to ridiculous patents, business contracts with term limits, poor managerial decisions, and possibly EU regulations that make it more expensive/harder to innovate.

replies(1): >>45077354 #
1. iamtedd ◴[] No.45077354[source]
It's probably because HMD Global doesn't actually own the Nokia brand. It's an exclusive licensing agreement with the still-existing Nokia company that makes network infrastructure.

The details are very easy to find out on Wikipedia.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMD_Global