←back to thread

110 points jonbaer | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.222s | source
Show context
utilize1808 ◴[] No.45073112[source]
I feel this is not the scalable/right way to approach this. The right way would be for human creators to apply their own digital signatures to the original pieces they created (specialised chips on camera/in software to inject hidden pixel patterns that are verifiable). If a piece of work lacks such signature, it should be considered AI-generated by default.
replies(3): >>45073155 #>>45073302 #>>45073834 #
shkkmo ◴[] No.45073155[source]
That seems like a horrible blow to anonymity and psuedonymity that would also empower identity thieves.
replies(3): >>45073244 #>>45073831 #>>45074209 #
1. xpe ◴[] No.45074209[source]
Maybe as the direct effect, maybe not. Also think about second order effects: how would various interests respond? The desire for privacy is strong and people will search for ways to get it.

Have you looked into kinds of mitigations that cryptography offers? I’m not an expert, but I would expect there are ways to balance some degree of anonymity with some degree of human identity verification.

Perhaps there are some experts out there who can comment?