←back to thread

110 points jonbaer | 6 comments | | HN request time: 0.785s | source | bottom
1. chii ◴[] No.45072544[source]
i find the premise to be an invalid one personally - why is the property that a works from an AI model must be identified/identifiable?
replies(2): >>45072650 #>>45073062 #
2. HighGoldstein ◴[] No.45072650[source]
Video evidence of you committing a crime, for example, should be identifiable as AI-generated.
replies(2): >>45072669 #>>45073301 #
3. chii ◴[] No.45072669[source]
how do we currently deal with tampered video evidence today, before the advent of ai generated videos? Why cant same methods be used for an ai generated video?
replies(1): >>45073662 #
4. hiatus ◴[] No.45073062[source]
People want to know when they are interacting with AI-generated content.
5. ◴[] No.45073301[source]
6. drdebug ◴[] No.45073662{3}[source]
If you are interested, you can look into the work of Hany Farid on this topic as a good introduction to image forensics and related topics.