(spectrum.ieee.org)

183 points WolfOliver | 1 comments | 29 Aug 25 15:24 UTC | HN request time: 0.273s | source

Show context

stocksinsmocks ◴[29 Aug 25 19:33 UTC] No.45068393[source]▶

So the author is providing some personal annotations and opinions on a summary of a “new paper” which was actually published five months ago, which itself was a summary of research with the author’s personal annotations and opinions added? These are exactly the kind of jobs that I want AI to automate.

replies(2): >>45071899 #>>45074230 #

majormajor ◴[30 Aug 25 04:20 UTC] No.45071899[source]▶

>>45068393 #

It's more likely that AI will let more people "write" random blogs and articles about things they haven't sufficiently actually researched... you're gonna get more spam, not less.

replies(1): >>45072471 #

1. zaphirplane ◴[30 Aug 25 06:53 UTC] No.45072471[source]▶

>>45071899 #

The solution is more AI, in the browser to tell you this link is to a rubbish AI blog, AI in the mail client to tell you which email content to ignore and AI in the fridge, in the bathroom. Till each person is so tightly locked in a group bubble they have no idea how colourful the world is and how many different personalities exist that for the most bring something to the table

↑

AI’s coding evolution hinges on collaboration and trust