←back to thread

520 points OlympicMarmoto | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.211s | source
Show context
Aurornis ◴[] No.45069549[source]
> They also got me reported to HR by the manager of the XROS effort for supposedly making his team members feel bad

I've only seen John Carmack's public interactions, but they've all been professional and kind.

It's depressing to imagine HR getting involved because someone's feelings had been hurt by an objective discussion from a person like John Carmack.

I'm having flashbacks to the times in my career when coworkers tried to weaponize HR to push their agenda. Every effort was eventually dismissed by HR, but there is a chilling effect on everyone when you realize that someone at the company is trying to put your job at stake because they didn't like something you said. The next time around, the people targeted are much more hesitant to speak up.

replies(17): >>45069589 #>>45069664 #>>45069669 #>>45069938 #>>45069973 #>>45070032 #>>45070078 #>>45070216 #>>45070238 #>>45070309 #>>45070347 #>>45071212 #>>45071220 #>>45071329 #>>45071667 #>>45072703 #>>45073186 #
jamra ◴[] No.45070347[source]
I followed his posts internally before he left. He was strict about resource waste. Hand tracking would break constantly and he brought metrics to his posts. His whole point was that Apple has hardware nailed down and it’ll be efficient software that will be the differentiator. The bloat at Meta was the result of empire building.
replies(4): >>45070428 #>>45070663 #>>45071882 #>>45071986 #
influx ◴[] No.45070663[source]
I followed his posts internally too. It's amazing how many people were arguing against fucking John Carmack. What a waste of talent.
replies(5): >>45071077 #>>45071229 #>>45072312 #>>45073248 #>>45074550 #
1. ignoramous ◴[] No.45071077[source]
> were arguing against fucking John Carmack

I am sure Carmack himself encourages debates and discussions. Lionizing one person can't be expected of every employee (unless that person is also the founder or the company is tiny).

replies(2): >>45072244 #>>45076305 #
2. eru ◴[] No.45072244[source]
I don't think you should treat the founder more special than eg John Carmack.

But I agree that civil discussion is good.

3. bckr ◴[] No.45076305[source]
I think the implication is that they were arguing poorly and wasting time