←back to thread

439 points diggan | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.334s | source
Show context
TheRoque ◴[] No.45065446[source]
To be honest, these companies already stole terabytes of data and don't even disclose their dataset, so you have to assume they'll steal and train at anything you throw at them
replies(4): >>45066376 #>>45066970 #>>45068970 #>>45077378 #
marssaxman ◴[] No.45066376[source]
"Reading stuff freely posted on the internet" constitutes stealing now?

Seems like an excessively draconian interpretation of property rights.

replies(10): >>45066424 #>>45066467 #>>45066537 #>>45068095 #>>45068974 #>>45069163 #>>45069363 #>>45069550 #>>45074841 #>>45076689 #
michaelmior ◴[] No.45066424[source]
"Reading stuff freely posted on the internet" is also very different from a business having machines consume large volumes of data posted on the Internet for the purpose of generating value for them without compensating the creators. I'm not making a value judgement one way or the other, but "reading stuff freely posted on the Internet" is an oversimplification.
replies(5): >>45066511 #>>45066562 #>>45068503 #>>45070930 #>>45071058 #
1. jMyles ◴[] No.45071058[source]
> "Reading stuff freely posted on the internet" is also very different from a business having machines consume large volumes of data

...not if you believe in the right of general-purpose computing. If they have the right to read the data, why don't they have a right to program a computer to do it for them?

I think we all agree that they're not the good guys here, but this reasoning in particular is troubling.