←back to thread

504 points Terretta | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
Shakahs ◴[] No.45068700[source]
Grok are the first models I am boycotting on purely environmental grounds. They built their datacenter without sufficient local power supply and have been illegally powering it with unpermitted gas turbine generators until that capacity gets built, to the significant detriment of the local population.

https://www.datacenterdynamics.com/en/news/elon-musk-xai-gas...

replies(9): >>45068962 #>>45069070 #>>45069207 #>>45069367 #>>45069477 #>>45069504 #>>45069856 #>>45070145 #>>45076564 #
nonethewiser ◴[] No.45068962[source]
It would be nice if they could get more power online faster.
replies(1): >>45069032 #
Tadpole9181 ◴[] No.45069032[source]
Well Elon really worked hard to get that done. Campaigning for the guy who is cancelling in-progress solar and wind projects and claiming the feds will never approve another green energy plant.
replies(2): >>45069225 #>>45069482 #
jameslk ◴[] No.45069225[source]
China controls 80% of the supply chain for solar and has most of the rare earth magnets needed for wind. Since China is America’s bugbear and containing China’s influence is a bipartisan issue, this was a likely outcome whoever is in office

https://www.iea.org/reports/solar-pv-global-supply-chains/ex...

Of course, renewables aren’t the only source of energy

replies(1): >>45069250 #
burkaman ◴[] No.45069250[source]
We don't have to guess what the most likely outcome might have been, someone else was in office 7 months ago so we can just look at what they were doing.
replies(1): >>45069294 #
jameslk ◴[] No.45069294[source]
Yes, moving away from China
replies(3): >>45069731 #>>45070282 #>>45070482 #
kelnos ◴[] No.45070282[source]
But not at the expense of building renewable energy, as is the current administration's policy.
replies(1): >>45070760 #