←back to thread

281 points GabrielBianconi | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
abdellah123 ◴[] No.45065135[source]
Wow, please edit the title to include Open-source !
replies(2): >>45065313 #>>45065796 #
numpad0 ◴[] No.45065796[source]
These open models are just commercial binary distributions made available at zero cost with intention to cripple opportunities for Western LLM providers to capitalize on investments.

These are more like really gorgeous corporate swags than FOSS.

replies(4): >>45067590 #>>45070046 #>>45070743 #>>45072256 #
1. echelon ◴[] No.45070046[source]
> cripple opportunities for Western LLM

Good! If they're not open, they're creating more lock-in. And on top of that, they're using information they don't own to do so and then renting it back to us.

replies(1): >>45070483 #
2. numpad0 ◴[] No.45070483[source]
I 100% support it as a consumer :P but IMO we do have to be aware that it's just a happy coincidence.