←back to thread

183 points WolfOliver | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.229s | source
Show context
manoDev ◴[] No.45066299[source]
I'm tired of the anthropomorphization marketing behind AI driving this kind of discussion. In a few years, all this talk will sound as dumb as stating "MS Word spell checker will replace writers" or "Photoshop will replace designers".

We'll reap the productivity benefits from this new tool, create more work for ourselves, output will stabilize at a new level and salaries will stagnate again, as it always happens.

replies(9): >>45066425 #>>45066524 #>>45067057 #>>45067320 #>>45067348 #>>45067450 #>>45068047 #>>45068717 #>>45068934 #
MintPaw ◴[] No.45067057[source]
You say it as a joke, but spell check has replaced certain tiers of editors. And Photoshop has replaced certain tiers of designers.
replies(2): >>45069076 #>>45069295 #
1. manoDev ◴[] No.45069295[source]
Not a joke.

Proofreaders still exist, despite spell checker. Art assistants still exist, despite Photoshop. There's always more work to do, you just incorporate the new tools and bump the productivity, until it gets so commoditized it stops being a competitive advantage.

Saying AI "replaces" anyone is just a matter of rhetoric to justify lower salaries, as always.