←back to thread

183 points WolfOliver | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
manoDev ◴[] No.45066299[source]
I'm tired of the anthropomorphization marketing behind AI driving this kind of discussion. In a few years, all this talk will sound as dumb as stating "MS Word spell checker will replace writers" or "Photoshop will replace designers".

We'll reap the productivity benefits from this new tool, create more work for ourselves, output will stabilize at a new level and salaries will stagnate again, as it always happens.

replies(9): >>45066425 #>>45066524 #>>45067057 #>>45067320 #>>45067348 #>>45067450 #>>45068047 #>>45068717 #>>45068934 #
kazinator ◴[] No.45066425[source]
Generative AI is replacing writers, designers, actors, ... it is nothing like just a spell checker or Phtoshop.

Everyday, I see ads on YouTube with smooth-talking, real-looking AI-generated actors. Each one represents one less person that would have been paid.

There is no exact measure of correctness in design; one bad bit does not stop the show. The clients don't even want real art. Artists sometimes refer to commercial work as "selling out", referring to hanging their artistic integrity on the hook to make a living. Now "selling out" competes with AI which has no artistic integrity to hang on the hook, works 24 hours a day for peanuts and is astonishingly prolific.

replies(9): >>45066641 #>>45066767 #>>45066873 #>>45066891 #>>45067034 #>>45067062 #>>45068106 #>>45068172 #>>45071280 #
burnte ◴[] No.45068106[source]
There's a difference between taking one thing and putting something else in it's spot, and truly REPLACING something. Yes, some ads have AI generated actors. You know because you can tell because they're "not quite right", rather than focusing on the message of the ad. Noticing AI in ads turns more people off than on, so AI ads are treated by a lot of people as an easy "avoid this company" signal. So those AI ads are in lieu of real actors, but not actually replacing them because people don't want to watch AI actors in an ad. The ad ceases to be effective. The "replacement" failed.
replies(1): >>45068223 #
zarzavat ◴[] No.45068223[source]
Realistic video generation only became a thing in the last year or so.

How long do you suppose it will be before we can't tell the difference between it and reality anymore? A few years at the most. Then what?

replies(1): >>45068956 #
1. burnte ◴[] No.45068956[source]
I don't think AI will ever be able to compete with real actors, not in a meaningful way.
replies(1): >>45069493 #
2. kazinator ◴[] No.45069493[source]
Animated films have competed for box office dollars since basically the dawn of cinema. Animated characters have fan followings.

Just wait; the stuff is coming. Ultra-realistic full-length feature films with compelling AI characters that are not consistent from beginning to end, but appear in multiple features.

The public will swallow it up.

replies(1): >>45078050 #
3. burnte ◴[] No.45078050[source]
Animation is drawn by humans, not AI. That's why it sells, it still has heart and emotion in it.