←back to thread

747 points porridgeraisin | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
Syzygies ◴[] No.45063736[source]
Claude assists me in my math research.

The scenario that concerns me is that Claude learns unpublished research ideas from me as we chat and code. Claude then suggests these same ideas to someone else, who legitimately believes this is now their work.

Clearly commercial accounts use AI to assist in developing intellectual product, and privacy is mandatory. The same can apply to individuals.

replies(9): >>45063744 #>>45064034 #>>45064105 #>>45064140 #>>45064248 #>>45064416 #>>45064428 #>>45065522 #>>45065601 #
thisOtterBeGood ◴[] No.45064140[source]
This perfectly describes one of the biggest dillema with AI. Where does an AI company stop to utilize human knowledge it does not actually own. Where do they draw the line. Apparently it's possible there aren't any lines drawn at all.
replies(1): >>45064192 #
sneak ◴[] No.45064192[source]
You can’t own knowledge. Intellectual property is a legal fiction invented to prop up industries.

You can no more own knowledge or information than you can own the number 2.

replies(2): >>45065253 #>>45068920 #
1. AvAn12 ◴[] No.45068920[source]
So Anthropic should have no property rights to its own source code?