←back to thread

The Synology End Game

(lowendbox.com)
452 points amacbride | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.199s | source
Show context
exmadscientist ◴[] No.45062103[source]
A big part of the appeal of Synology was that you could just forget about it. I have a little one in the corner that's just been sitting there serving files out over SMB for years now. It doesn't need to do anything more and I don't need to think about it.

A lot of the alternatives being proposed are not so easy to maintain. A full general purpose OS install doesn't really take care of itself. And I don't have (and don't want) a 19-inch rack at home. Ever.

So what's the set-up-and-forget-until-it-gets-kicked-over option?

replies(13): >>45062180 #>>45062219 #>>45062300 #>>45062590 #>>45062803 #>>45062819 #>>45063449 #>>45066493 #>>45067267 #>>45067468 #>>45067497 #>>45067832 #>>45068735 #
joshstrange ◴[] No.45062180[source]
This.

I came to Synology after years of managing regular Linux (Debian) servers, then Unraid, and then Synology.

Synology was the most expensive thing I’ve used but I also _never_ think about it. The same could not be said for previous setups.

I want a stupid-easy NAS, plug-and-play, hotswapable bays. I’m not interested in having to shut down a tower and open it up to swap/add drives.

I have 2x12-bay Synology’s and I haven’t found an equivalent product yet (open to options).

replies(4): >>45068205 #>>45068668 #>>45068737 #>>45070978 #
1. MangoCoffee ◴[] No.45068737[source]
agree. i have two synology NAS. i just set them up and forget it since i don't open for outside access.

its a great backup for all your important files.