←back to thread

The web does not need gatekeepers: Cloudflare’s new “signed agents” pitch

(positiveblue.substack.com)
454 points positiveblue | 3 comments | 29 Aug 25 16:35 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
TIPSIO ◴[29 Aug 25 16:57 UTC] No.45066555[source]▶
Everyone loves the dream of a free for all and open web.

But the reality is how can someone small protect their blog or content from AI training bots? E.g.: They just blindly trust someone is sending Agent vs Training bots and super duper respecting robots.txt? Get real...

Or, fine what if they do respect robots.txt, but they buy the data that may or may not have been shielded through liability layers via "licensed data"?

Unless you're reddit, X, Google, or Meta with scary unlimited budget legal teams, you have no power.

Great video: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/M0QyOp7zqcY

replies(37): >>45066600 #>>45066626 #>>45066827 #>>45066906 #>>45066945 #>>45066976 #>>45066979 #>>45067024 #>>45067058 #>>45067180 #>>45067399 #>>45067434 #>>45067570 #>>45067621 #>>45067750 #>>45067890 #>>45067955 #>>45068022 #>>45068044 #>>45068075 #>>45068077 #>>45068166 #>>45068329 #>>45068436 #>>45068551 #>>45068588 #>>45069623 #>>45070279 #>>45070690 #>>45071600 #>>45071816 #>>45075075 #>>45075398 #>>45077464 #>>45077583 #>>45080415 #>>45101938 #
wvenable ◴[29 Aug 25 18:51 UTC] No.45067955[source]▶
> Everyone loves the dream of a free for all and open web... But the reality is how can someone small protect their blog or content from AI training bots?

Aren't these statements entirely in conflict? You either have a free for all open web or you don't. Blocking AI training bots is not free and open for all.

replies(8): >>45067998 #>>45068139 #>>45068376 #>>45068589 #>>45068929 #>>45069170 #>>45073712 #>>45074969 #
BrenBarn ◴[29 Aug 25 18:55 UTC] No.45067998[source]▶
I think that was the point. Everyone loves the dream, but the reality is different.
replies(1): >>45068015 #
wilson090 ◴[29 Aug 25 18:58 UTC] No.45068015[source]▶
How so? If you don't want AI bots reading information on the web, you don't actually want a free and open web. The reality of an open web is that such information is free and available for anyone.
replies(6): >>45068058 #>>45068155 #>>45068305 #>>45068547 #>>45068621 #>>45068828 #
pton_xd ◴[29 Aug 25 19:24 UTC] No.45068305[source]▶
> If you don't want AI bots reading information on the web, you don't actually want a free and open web.

This is such a bad faith argument.

We want a town center for the whole community to enjoy! What, you don't like those people shooting up drugs over there? But they're enjoying it too, this is what you wanted right? They're not harming you by doing their drugs. Everyone is enjoying it!

replies(4): >>45068568 #>>45068731 #>>45071476 #>>45071478 #
1. wvenable ◴[29 Aug 25 20:01 UTC] No.45068731[source]▶
If an AI bot is accessing my site the way that regular users are accessing my site -- in other words everyone is using the town center as intended -- what is the problem?

Seems to be a lot of conflating of badly coded (intentionally or not) scrapers and AI. That is a problem that predates AI's existence.

replies(1): >>45073366 #
2. integralid ◴[30 Aug 25 09:57 UTC] No.45073366[source]▶
So if I buy a DDoS service and DDoS your site, it's ok as long as it accesses it the same way regular people do? In sorry for extreme example, it's obviously not, but that's how I understand your position as written.

We can also consider 10 exploit attempts per second that my site sees.

replies(1): >>45077560 #
3. wvenable ◴[30 Aug 25 20:02 UTC] No.45077560[source]▶
The issue is that people seem to be conflating badly built scraper bots with AI. If an AI accessed my site as frequently as a normal human (or say Googlebot) then that particular complaint merely goes away. It never had anything to do with AI itself.