←back to thread

182 points tencentshill | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.22s | source
Show context
JumpCrisscross ◴[] No.45065373[source]
Healthcare, especially the patient-facing part, isn’t like other services.

If we want private ownership of this infrastructure it has to look more like either a utility, where the state has a direct say in service changes and pricing, or a partnership, where unlimited liability flows through to the owners. I’m a fan of the latter.

Limited liability was an amazing invention. But it’s not appropriate for healthcare. Turn these services into partnerships and you’ll see the give-a-shit factor quintuple overnight. (You’ll also probably see a reduction in leverage.)

replies(6): >>45065661 #>>45065822 #>>45066408 #>>45066413 #>>45066729 #>>45066795 #
lokar ◴[] No.45065661[source]
I agree, there should be no limited liability for for-profit healthcare organizations.

And non-profit health care orgs should have strict regulation, and the state should appoint some of the members of the board.

replies(2): >>45065782 #>>45065849 #
JumpCrisscross ◴[] No.45065782[source]
> there should be no limited liability for for-profit healthcare organizations

Any. If you ringfence it to for-profit companies you'll just wind up with non-profits either siphoning profits away or exorbitantly compensating their leadership.

replies(2): >>45065919 #>>45068112 #
1. BrenBarn ◴[] No.45068112[source]
Just hard-cap compensation.