/top/
/new/
/best/
/ask/
/show/
/job/
^
slacker news
login
about
←back to thread
John Carmack's arguments against building a custom XR OS at Meta
(twitter.com)
520 points
OlympicMarmoto
| 3 comments |
29 Aug 25 16:45 UTC
|
HN request time: 0.417s
|
source
https://xcancel.com/ID_AA_Carmack/status/1961172409920491849
1.
GeekyBear
◴[
29 Aug 25 17:46 UTC
]
No.
45067209
[source]
▶
>>45066395 (OP)
#
My objection is that there is no universe in which Meta can be trusted with direct access to your raw gaze tracking data.
The only thing I can imagine that would be more invasive would require a brain implant.
replies(2):
>>45069443
#
>>45070640
#
ID:
GO
2.
qiine
◴[
29 Aug 25 21:12 UTC
]
No.
45069443
[source]
▶
>>45067209 (TP)
#
sadly they are working on it
3.
mrpippy
◴[
29 Aug 25 23:45 UTC
]
No.
45070640
[source]
▶
>>45067209 (TP)
#
My understanding is that this is a key tenant of visionOS’s design, where apps don’t get access to gaze data (I think unless they’re taking over the full screen?)
↑