←back to thread

183 points WolfOliver | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
manoDev ◴[] No.45066299[source]
I'm tired of the anthropomorphization marketing behind AI driving this kind of discussion. In a few years, all this talk will sound as dumb as stating "MS Word spell checker will replace writers" or "Photoshop will replace designers".

We'll reap the productivity benefits from this new tool, create more work for ourselves, output will stabilize at a new level and salaries will stagnate again, as it always happens.

replies(9): >>45066425 #>>45066524 #>>45067057 #>>45067320 #>>45067348 #>>45067450 #>>45068047 #>>45068717 #>>45068934 #
ACCount37 ◴[] No.45066524[source]
I'm tired of all the "yet another tool" reductionism. It reeks of cope.

It took under a decade to get AI to this stage - where it can build small scripts and tiny services entirely on its own. I see no fundamental limitations that would prevent further improvements. I see no reason why it would stop at human level of performance either.

replies(11): >>45066554 #>>45066563 #>>45066599 #>>45066617 #>>45066649 #>>45066675 #>>45066708 #>>45066751 #>>45067130 #>>45067218 #>>45067573 #
1. luqtas ◴[] No.45066649[source]
> ... entirely on its own

ok, ok! just like you can find for much less computation power involved using a search engine, forums/websites having if not your question, something similar or a snippet [0] helping you solve your doubt... all of that free of tokens and companies profiting over what the internet have build! even FOSS generative AI can give billions USD to GPU manufacturers

[0] just a silly script that can lead a bunch of logic: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70058132/how-do-i-make-a...