(old.reddit.com)

439 points diggan | 1 comments | 29 Aug 25 11:39 UTC | HN request time: 0.331s | source

Show context

vb-8448 ◴[29 Aug 25 14:07 UTC] No.45064336[source]▶

So, I guess they run out of data to train on ...

I wonder on how much they can rely on the data and what kind of "knowledge" they can extract. I never give feedback and most time (let's say 5 out of 6) the result cc produce it simply wrong. How can they know the result is valuable or not?

replies(2): >>45064810 #>>45066420 #

debesyla ◴[29 Aug 25 16:47 UTC] No.45066420[source]▶

>>45064336 #

Maybe they can use same method as Google does - if user clicked a link and didn't try to search again, it can assume the link had intended result.

So your silence can be used as a warmish signal that you were satisfied. (...or not. Depends on your usage fingerprint.)

replies(1): >>45066551 #

1. rurp ◴[29 Aug 25 16:57 UTC] No.45066551[source]▶

>>45066420 #

I expect that's a very weak signal. When I ask a question and get a completely wrong answer from Claude I usually drop the chat and look elsewhere.

↑

If you have a Claude account, they're going to train on your data moving forward