←back to thread

Tesla said it didn't have key data in a fatal crash, then a hacker found it

(www.washingtonpost.com)
650 points clcaev | 1 comments | 29 Aug 25 11:15 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
ddtaylor[dead post] ◴[29 Aug 25 13:03 UTC] No.45063582[source]▶
[flagged]
lexicality ◴[29 Aug 25 13:27 UTC] No.45063835[source]▶
The hacker is named and you can see his work in the page. Read TFA
replies(2): >>45063915 #>>45066057 #
claar ◴[29 Aug 25 13:33 UTC] No.45063915[source]▶
It's paywalled.
replies(2): >>45065119 #>>45066091 #
1. ddtaylor ◴[29 Aug 25 16:22 UTC] No.45066091[source]▶
The article is paywalled, but it also only calls the person "the hacker" and then says this:

> The hacker, known online by his X handle @greentheonly, did not testify in the case.

So, we have information that we cannot prove being given by a person who won't testify in court? How is this proper chain of evidence, etc.?