I would have thought it uncontroversial view among software engineers that token quality is much important than token output speed.
I would have thought it uncontroversial view among software engineers that token quality is much important than token output speed.
Of course, 95% of them are fixing things they broke in earlier commits and their overall quality is the worst on the team. But, holy cow, they can output crap faster than anyone I’ve seen.
But sure, ok, maybe it could mean making much faster progress than competitors. But then again, it could also mean that competitors have a much more mature platform, and you're only releasing new things so often because you're playing catch-up.
(And note that I'm not specifically talking about LLMs here. This metric is useless for pretty much any kind of app or service.)
But even if your interpretation is correct, frequency of releases still is not a good metric. That could just mean that you have a lot to fix, and/or you keep breaking and fixing things along the way.