←back to thread

650 points clcaev | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
breadwinner ◴[] No.45064207[source]
> In the annotated video played for the jury, the vehicle detects a vehicle about 170 feet away. A subsequent frame shows it detecting a pedestrian about 116 feet away. As McGee hurtles closer and closer, the video shows the Tesla planning a path through Angulo’s truck, right where he and his girlfriend were standing behind signs and reflectors highlighting the end of the road.

So the Tesla detected the vehicle and the pedestrian, and then plans a path through them? Wow! How bad is this software?

replies(4): >>45064526 #>>45065541 #>>45065884 #>>45065936 #
skeezyboy ◴[] No.45064526[source]
AI is so unlike anything weve ever seen and its going to revolutionise the world and its literally gna be skynet except it pathfinds like a counterstrike bot just ignore that bit
replies(2): >>45065229 #>>45065754 #
xgulfie ◴[] No.45065229[source]
Just 2 more years bro just 2 more years and we'll have self driving cars working trust me bro
replies(2): >>45065473 #>>45070902 #
AndrewKemendo ◴[] No.45065473[source]
https://waymo.com/rides/san-francisco/

You can take a Waymo any time of day in SF and they provide 1000s of successful rides daily

replies(2): >>45065631 #>>45065794 #
1. skeezyboy ◴[] No.45065631[source]
And theyve had to spend how many manhours engineering around shit like the above?
replies(3): >>45065874 #>>45066074 #>>45067269 #
2. wuteva ◴[] No.45065874[source]
Your point being?
3. overfeed ◴[] No.45066074[source]
Not all self-driving vehicles are created equal, Tesla and Waymo are not in the same league.

I'm curious; why does it matter to you how many man-hours Waymo spends on a functional service? Would it be disqualifying if it's "too much" in your estimation?

4. CamperBob2 ◴[] No.45067269[source]
Driving is hard.