←back to thread

747 points porridgeraisin | 6 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source | bottom
Show context
troad ◴[] No.45062852[source]
You can opt out, but the fact that it's opt-in by default and made to look like a simple T/C update prompt leaves a sour taste in my mouth. The five year retention period seems... excessive. I wonder if they've buried anything else objectionable in the new terms.

It was the kick in the pants I needed to cancel my subscription.

replies(22): >>45062875 #>>45062894 #>>45062895 #>>45062930 #>>45062936 #>>45062949 #>>45062975 #>>45063015 #>>45063070 #>>45063116 #>>45063150 #>>45063171 #>>45063186 #>>45063387 #>>45063615 #>>45064792 #>>45064955 #>>45064986 #>>45064996 #>>45066593 #>>45070194 #>>45074231 #
1. I_am_tiberius ◴[] No.45062936[source]
"five year retention". If it's in a model once, it's there forever.
replies(3): >>45063032 #>>45064024 #>>45064875 #
2. Hnrobert42 ◴[] No.45063032[source]
Is that true? Do models get rebuilt from scratch each time or do they get iterated on?
replies(1): >>45063058 #
3. I_am_tiberius ◴[] No.45063058[source]
I believe the big models currently get built from scratch (with random starting weights). That wasn't my point though. I meant a model created once, might be used for a very long time. Maybe they even release the weights at one point ("open source").
replies(1): >>45063121 #
4. ◴[] No.45063121{3}[source]
5. whimsicalism ◴[] No.45064024[source]
yes, it’s a very big loophole. and if it’s a generative model, you can just launder the data through synthetic generation/distillation to future models
6. disconcision ◴[] No.45064875[source]
this is somewhat true but i'm not sure how load bearing it is. for one, i think it's going to be a while until 'we asked the model what bob said' is as admissible as the result of a database query