←back to thread

The Synology End Game

(lowendbox.com)
452 points amacbride | 1 comments | 29 Aug 25 06:37 UTC | HN request time: 0.201s | source
Show context
M95D ◴[29 Aug 25 08:47 UTC] No.45061719[source]▶
But self-building a NAS is still a problem, and I'm also talking about this [1] article from the same blog:

There are NO low power NAS boards. I'm talking about something with an ARM CPU, no video, no audio, lots of memory (or SODIMM slot) and 10+ SATA ports.

Sure, anyone can buy a self-powered USB3 hub and add 7 external HDDs to a raspbery, but that level of performance is really really low, not to mention the USB random disconnects. And no, port replicators aren't much better.

[1] https://lowendbox.com/blog/are-you-recyling-old-hardware-for...

replies(14): >>45061750 #>>45061794 #>>45061859 #>>45061869 #>>45061894 #>>45062063 #>>45062494 #>>45062628 #>>45064215 #>>45064499 #>>45067093 #>>45067377 #>>45068745 #>>45071007 #
1. whizzter ◴[29 Aug 25 11:19 UTC] No.45062628[source]▶
It's better now, been annoyed like you but the Rpi5 comes in a 16gb variant and has a PCI-E port that can be extended to 5x SATA or 2x M2. It's not blazing but probably an improvement over my old Celeron J1800 with 8gb of ram.

The Intel N100,etc series of machines seems popular with builders even if the RAM restrictions drives me nuts.

I think the major issue seems to be cases actually, there's tons of small cheap AMD machines from manufacturers like BeeLink that trounce most NUC setups for performance, but like the NUC's as soon as there's disc enclosures the price shoots away.