←back to thread

1308 points rickybule | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.281s | source

Indonesia is currently in chaos. Earlier today, the government blocked access to Twitter & Discord knowing news spread mainly through those channels. Usually we can use Cloudflare's WARP to avoid it, but just today they blocked the access as well. What alternative should we use?
Show context
bdd8f1df777b ◴[] No.45061811[source]
If you need to bypass censorship, you'll need a tool specifically designed for anti-censorship, rather than any one repurposed for that.

Since China has the most advanced network censorship, the Chinese have also invented the most advanced anti-censorship tools.

The first generation is shadowsocks. It basically encrypts the traffic from the beginning without any handshakes, so DPI cannot find out its nature. This is very simple and fast and should suffice in most places.

The second generation is the Trojan protocol. The lack of a handshake in shadowsocks is also a distinguishing feature that may alert the censor and the censor can decide to block shadowsocks traffic based on suspicions alone. Trojan instead tries to blend in the vast amount of HTTPS traffic over the Internet by pretending to be a normal Web server protected by HTTPS.

After Trojan, a plethora of protocol based on TLS camouflaging have been invented.

1. Add padding to avoid the TLS-in-TLS traffic characteristics in the original Trojan protocol. Protocols: XTLS-VLESS-VISION.

2. Use QUIC instead of TCP+TLS for better performance (very visible if your latency to your tunnel server is high). Protocols: Hysteria2 and TUIC.

3. Multiplex multiple proxy sessions in one TCP connection. Protocols: h2mux, smux, yamux.

4. Steal other websites' certificates. Protocols: ShadowTLS, ShadowQUIC, XTLS-REALITY.

Oh, and there is masking UDP traffic as ICMP traffic or TCP traffic to bypass ISP's QoS if you are proxying traffic through QUIC. Example: phantun.

replies(7): >>45061881 #>>45062023 #>>45062220 #>>45062335 #>>45062348 #>>45063468 #>>45063689 #
cm2187 ◴[] No.45061881[source]
Does starlink work in China?
replies(2): >>45061969 #>>45065583 #
bdd8f1df777b ◴[] No.45061969[source]
No, it’s illegal to bring starlink devices here, and I heard that Elon Musk chooses to block China from accessing starlink too, to appease the Chinese authorities.
replies(2): >>45062129 #>>45062234 #
boxed ◴[] No.45062129[source]
"Appease" is such a loaded word. He's literally not allowed by law to do it. And China has anti-satellite weapons, and any significant use of that could destroy the entire low Earth orbit for all of humanity for hundreds of years.
replies(6): >>45062191 #>>45062235 #>>45062353 #>>45062764 #>>45063034 #>>45065558 #
1. bloak ◴[] No.45062353[source]
I agree with the first two sentences, but the third sentence seems a bit unnecessary seeing as there are plenty of less violent ways for China to enforce its own laws!