←back to thread

The Synology End Game

(lowendbox.com)
452 points amacbride | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.256s | source
Show context
DocTomoe ◴[] No.45061352[source]
Semi-OT:

I currently have a QNAP TS-451D2. I use it mainly with a MacBook Pro. Something in QNAPs Samba implementation makes it glacially slow in that configuration. While it still does AFP (and then becomes somewhat decent to use), it's only a question of time for apple to chop that protocol.

With QNAP having proven to be substandard and Synology going evil, what other options for a mid-range, local NAS for the tech guy who doesn't want to have another thing to tinker with do exist? I'm thinking 'appliance', not 'project'. Ideally, I want to just set it up once and then forget about it.

replies(6): >>45061411 #>>45061503 #>>45061521 #>>45061809 #>>45064102 #>>45068542 #
makeitdouble ◴[] No.45061809[source]
Would NFS be faster ?

It was years ago but for whatever reason SMB was slow on my Mac even when connecting to Linux boxes. I mapped my user ID to the Synology user and switched to straight NFS instead, per wise it was night and day.

replies(1): >>45062246 #
1. lostlogin ◴[] No.45062246[source]
It’s baffling how messed up it is on the Mac.

I get more reliable speeds and connections from an Ubuntu VM that’s running on the same Mac than I do from the Mac. How can this happen?