←back to thread

210 points scapecast | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.235s | source
Show context
amelius ◴[] No.45061919[source]
The main problem is they didn't use reusable rockets, so these couldn't be properly tested before putting a human crew in.

This problem seems mostly solved now.

replies(2): >>45062044 #>>45068772 #
bell-cot ◴[] No.45062044[source]
What would "proper testing" look like, to have caught and corrected the fatal design flaw?

The shuttle was about as reusable as the Falcon 9 is now. Though at vastly higher expense.

replies(2): >>45062242 #>>45069311 #
1. rbanffy ◴[] No.45062242[source]
The shuttle needed extensive refurbishment between flights. It wasn’t until after the loss of Columbia that they examined heat shield damage in orbit, assuming any damage observed on the ground would have occurred during reentry. For an organisation so risk averse as NASA, I was surprised how little focus was placed on the orbiters as experimental vehicles.