←back to thread

I Am An AI Hater

(anthonymoser.github.io)
443 points BallsInIt | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.204s | source
Show context
tzumaoli ◴[] No.45045322[source]
It's interesting to see the trend of the attitude towards GenAI in Hacker News through out the years. This is totally vibe based and I don't have numbers to back it up, but back in 2022-2023, the site was dominantly people who mostly treat GenAI as a curious technology without too much attachment, and some non-trivial amount of folks who are very skeptical of the tech. More recently I see a lot more people who see themselves as evangelists and try very hard to boost/advocate the technology (see all the "LLM coding changes my life" posts). It seems that the tide has turned back a little bit again since we now see this kind of posts surfacing.

For me, I kind of wish this site to go back to the good old days where people just share their nerdy niche hacker things and not filling the first page with the same arguments we see on the other parts of the internet over and over again. ; ) But granted I was attracted by the clickbait title too, so I can't blame others.

replies(5): >>45045683 #>>45045701 #>>45046798 #>>45047726 #>>45051815 #
petralithic ◴[] No.45045683[source]
Curious technology? People were foaming at the mouth about "license concerns" when GitHub Copilot was first announced, saying they're going to boycott Microsoft. But just like all things, over time people realize they're not as good or bad as initially thought. I noticed this too with media generation, people on Twitter were very mad about it and now many of them use Photoshop's AI features.
replies(1): >>45051681 #
AlecSchueler ◴[] No.45051681[source]
Are you sure they're the same people?
replies(1): >>45053988 #
petralithic ◴[] No.45053988[source]
They asked about general trends so it doesn't matter if it's the same people or not as long as the average sentiment has changed.
replies(1): >>45061371 #
AlecSchueler ◴[] No.45061371[source]
How have you measured the average?
replies(1): >>45061532 #
1. petralithic ◴[] No.45061532[source]
I haven't, although I'm sure there exists a way to do. The point is that if one were on HN and reading the threads on AI in 2021, they'll see dissent as being nothing new.