←back to thread

The Space Shuttle Columbia disaster and the over-reliance on PowerPoint (2019)

(mcdreeamiemusings.com)
210 points scapecast | 3 comments | 28 Aug 25 21:44 UTC | HN request time: 0.647s | source
Show context
userbinator ◴[29 Aug 25 03:42 UTC] No.45059908[source]▶
falling nine times faster than a fired bullet

No, that's not how the physics works. The foam is moving at the same velocity as the shuttle when it breaks off, and had a short time to accelerate(decelerate) before hitting the shuttle.

replies(1): >>45060120 #
1. KiwiJohnno ◴[29 Aug 25 04:16 UTC] No.45060120[source]▶
THANK YOU. I've seen the velocity of the space shuttle quoted as the speed that the foam had when it hit Columbia's wing so many times, and it bugs the crap out of me.
replies(1): >>45060282 #
2. userbinator ◴[29 Aug 25 04:41 UTC] No.45060282[source]▶
If that was the actual impact velocity of the foam, there would not be any doubt about whether the shuttle would survive reentry, that is if it even managed to make it all the way into space.
replies(1): >>45103636 #
3. blankx32 ◴[02 Sep 25 14:32 UTC] No.45103636[source]▶
As the crew rose at 28,968 kilometres per hour the piece of foam collided with one of the tiles on the outer edge of the shuttle’s left wing.

This also cannot be correct at approx 82 seconds into flight.