←back to thread

440 points pseudolus | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.037s | source
Show context
jimmont ◴[] No.45059611[source]
Organizations are choosing to eliminate workers rather than amplify them with AI because they'd rather own 100% of diminished capacity than share proceeds from exponentially increased capacity. That's the rent extraction model consuming its own productive infrastructure. The Stanford study documents organizations systematically choosing inferior economic strategies because their rent-extraction frameworks cannot conceptualize workers as productive assets to amplify. This reveals that these organizations are economic rent-seekers that happen to have productive workers, not production companies that happen to extract rents. When forced to choose between preserving rent extraction structures or maximizing value creation, they preserve extraction even at the cost of destroying productive capacity. So what comes next?
replies(11): >>45059745 #>>45059774 #>>45059838 #>>45059845 #>>45059868 #>>45059973 #>>45060115 #>>45060131 #>>45060415 #>>45061533 #>>45062067 #
lurk2 ◴[] No.45059973[source]
ChatGPT (might have) made a few superfluous email jobs obsolete and the people responding to this comment are acting like we’re standing on the threshold of Terminator 3.
replies(2): >>45060114 #>>45061718 #
1. zarzavat ◴[] No.45060114[source]
Don't underestimate how much of the economy is "superfluous email jobs". Have you seen how stupid the average person is?[0] These people need jobs too.

[0] I was going to going to mark this as sarcasm but then I remembered that the US elected Donald Trump as president, 2 times so far, so I'm going to play it straight.

replies(1): >>45060396 #
2. tonyhart7 ◴[] No.45060396[source]
so instead of training and educate this people, you want them to keep that "obsolete" job????

a little bit late aren't we??? because if we do that, then we would still use postman to send message