←back to thread

440 points pseudolus | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.224s | source
Show context
muldvarp ◴[] No.45052736[source]
Brutal that software engineering went from one of the least automatable jobs to a job that is universally agreed to be "most exposed to automation".

Was good while it lasted though.

replies(15): >>45052803 #>>45052830 #>>45052911 #>>45052938 #>>45053022 #>>45053037 #>>45056787 #>>45056886 #>>45057129 #>>45057182 #>>45057448 #>>45057657 #>>45057837 #>>45058585 #>>45063626 #
elif ◴[] No.45056787[source]
I'm not sure it's that our job is the most automatable, but that the interface is the easiest to adapt to our workflow.

I have a feeling language models will be good at virtually every "sit at a desk" job in a virtually identical capacity, it's just the act of plugging an AI into these roles is non-obvious.

Like every business was impacted by the Internet equally, the early applications were just an artifact of what was an easy business decision.. e.g. it was easier to start a dotcom than to migrate a traditional corporate process.

What we will see here with AI is not the immediate replacement of jobs, but the disruption of markets with offerings that human labor simply can't out-compete.

replies(4): >>45057205 #>>45057665 #>>45059706 #>>45059819 #
1. calebh ◴[] No.45059706[source]
I'm not so certain that non-desk jobs will be safe either. What makes the current LLMs great at programming is the vast amount of training data. There might be some other breakthrough for typical jobs - some combination of reinforcement learning, training on videos of people doing things, LLMs and old-fashioned AI.