←back to thread

RSS is awesome

(evanverma.com)
314 points edverma2 | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
k2enemy ◴[] No.45058232[source]
Boy do I feel old if a short, low content PSA about the existence of RSS is considered "hacker news."
replies(7): >>45058309 #>>45058454 #>>45058489 #>>45058541 #>>45058591 #>>45061167 #>>45062446 #
user3939382 ◴[] No.45058489[source]
RSS is the antidote to algorithm feeds. I’m glad for any mention of it. 90% of the tools users need were built 1970-2000 including RSS.
replies(2): >>45059015 #>>45059084 #
cxr ◴[] No.45059084[source]
What's an algorithm?
replies(2): >>45059243 #>>45070912 #
ZYbCRq22HbJ2y7 ◴[] No.45059243{3}[source]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recommender_system
replies(1): >>45059549 #
1. tolerance ◴[] No.45059549{4}[source]
The parent comment raises a valid distinction.

> In contrast, a heuristic is an approach to solving problems without well-defined correct or optimal results.[2] For example, although social media recommender systems are commonly called "algorithms", they actually rely on heuristics as there is no truly "correct" recommendation.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algorithm

What are the consequences of conflating the two terms? I’m not sure yet.

replies(1): >>45059606 #
2. ZYbCRq22HbJ2y7 ◴[] No.45059606[source]
> The parent comment raises a valid distinction.

Not really, as described in the quote you shared, it is common to refer to "recommendation systems" as "algorithms", even if its not actually such a thing.

There are plenty of examples of well-known aliases to concepts that obfuscate actual meaning in the English language, but they aren't wrong, as language is usage.

replies(1): >>45059754 #
3. tolerance ◴[] No.45059754[source]
It’s actually not such a thing. So is the distinction valid or not?
replies(1): >>45067565 #
4. user3939382 ◴[] No.45067565{3}[source]
It depends how pedantic you’re feeling.