←back to thread

RSS is awesome

(evanverma.com)
314 points edverma2 | 8 comments | | HN request time: 0.861s | source | bottom
1. nine_k ◴[] No.45059517[source]
RSS is terrible as a format (Atom is much better), but RSS is awesome as an idea. If your web site were a database, RSS would be like WAL. If your website were differentiable, it would be like its derivative, or rather a Lagrangian, taken at the moment of last update.

(BTW all serious static site generators know how to produce an RSS/Atom feed.)

replies(3): >>45059603 #>>45059676 #>>45060988 #
2. DamnInteresting ◴[] No.45059603[source]
We should popularize a JSON-based alternative, we'll call it "Absurdly Simple Syndication."
replies(3): >>45059707 #>>45060066 #>>45062689 #
3. pentagrama ◴[] No.45059676[source]
I like the general term "Web feed" as an umbrella term, I found about that on this article https://lighthouseapp.io/blog/what-are-web-feeds

Also that blog has some other good related articles:

- What is RSS: https://lighthouseapp.io/blog/what-is-rss

- What is Atom: https://lighthouseapp.io/blog/what-is-atom

- What is JSON feed: https://lighthouseapp.io/blog/what-is-json-feed

- What are feed readers: https://lighthouseapp.io/blog/what-are-feed-readers

- What is OPML: https://lighthouseapp.io/blog/what-is-opml

4. nine_k ◴[] No.45059707[source]
How about JSON Enhanced Syndication and Tracking?
replies(1): >>45059714 #
5. ◴[] No.45059714{3}[source]
6. advisedwang ◴[] No.45060066[source]
Because the main content of a blog post is an article, markup actually works really nicely. Although I suppose you could embed HTML in a JSON string
7. rawling ◴[] No.45060988[source]
Your site's RSS feed is just another view of the items on your site, no? It's the RSS _reader_ that "differentiates" it for you?
8. DonHopkins ◴[] No.45062689[source]
And instead of "feeds", call them "holes". And instead "subscriptions", they're "heads up". Dave Winer's would be the biggest with the most!

https://web.archive.org/web/20070910131413/http://news.com.c...