←back to thread

210 points scapecast | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
bigstrat2003 ◴[] No.45059108[source]
I don't see how this has anything to do with PowerPoint. There wasn't clear communication; the medium was completely incidental to that. They could have been writing on a chalkboard and had a communication failure, does that mean that chalkboards should be blamed in that case?
replies(6): >>45059191 #>>45059348 #>>45059699 #>>45060601 #>>45061971 #>>45067121 #
stinkbeetle ◴[] No.45059191[source]
Because the medium is not conducive to dense amount of technical information that readers are expected to use to make or understand decisions. Other similar mediums like a chalkboard were not singled out because the problem was identified with PowerPoint specifically. And it wasn't a choice of mediums all with similar problems, but slides vs papers. From the article,

> “The Board views the endemic use of PowerPoint briefing slides instead of technical papers as an illustration of the problematic methods of technical communication at NASA.”

replies(3): >>45059219 #>>45060207 #>>45063329 #
1. breadwinner ◴[] No.45059219[source]
Would it be better if you sent them a PDF document instead? There seems to be an assumption here that if you send the stakeholders a larger volume of information they will take the time to read it. Is that a valid assumption?
replies(2): >>45059711 #>>45063610 #
2. mhh__ ◴[] No.45059711[source]
Memos and reports also ask the author to try to explain things clearly and at length, a PowerPoint, even a technical one is usually figures and bullet points

Jeff bezos iirc speaks at length about this.

3. stinkbeetle ◴[] No.45063610[source]
Are you asking me what I (a layperson having no knowledge of the organizations or projects) think, or are you asking me to look up the recommendations in the report that found over use of PowerPoint to have contributed to the communication problems at NASA for you?