←back to thread

210 points scapecast | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.003s | source
Show context
gjejcjekdnfnwja ◴[] No.45058702[source]
As an engineer, that slide looks completely reasonable to me. Its purpose was to communicate technical info, which it did adequately. Keep in mind that the subject matter is highly technical, given that we're literally talking about the Space Shuttle, and more than a high school level of reading comprehension is heavily implied. If the NASA personnel weren't competent enough to review technical data without a pithy summary, that's on them.
replies(12): >>45058746 #>>45058884 #>>45058926 #>>45058940 #>>45058950 #>>45058984 #>>45059072 #>>45059150 #>>45059232 #>>45061181 #>>45061650 #>>45069334 #
wat10000 ◴[] No.45058926[source]
"That's on them" is not acceptable for an engineer when lives are on the line. Part of your job is making people understand what they need to understand. If their lack of understanding means people die, then you need to do your job and figure out how to communicate effectively to the audience you have, not the audience you want.
replies(2): >>45058938 #>>45059100 #
gjejcjekdnfnwja ◴[] No.45058938[source]
People with a high school level education should not have been making life and death decisions about the Space Shuttle.
replies(1): >>45058971 #
wat10000 ◴[] No.45058971[source]
First of all, is that actually their level of education or are you just making stuff up?

Second, that's irrelevant to my point that the engineer is responsible for communicating, not just figuring stuff out. You cannot say "if you don't get it, that's your problem" when their not getting it means people die.

replies(1): >>45058997 #
gjejcjekdnfnwja ◴[] No.45058997[source]
The slide in the OP is a completely standard way of commumicating information in the aerospace industry. If the NASA personnel had problems understanding this slide, then they also had problems understanding virtually every other piece of technical info that was ever communicated to them by a third party. College level reading comprehension means being able to understand nuance, which this slide conveys.
replies(1): >>45059011 #
1. wat10000 ◴[] No.45059011{3}[source]
All you're doing here is convincing me that this wasn't a one-off and the aerospace industry has a pervasive problem with communication.
replies(1): >>45059073 #
2. fhdbdnfnndnn ◴[] No.45059073[source]
The average IQ and level of English proficiency is much higher in aerospace than it is building web apps.
replies(1): >>45061215 #
3. poulpy123 ◴[] No.45061215[source]
Manifestly the high IQ and English proficiency in aerospace does not extend to the ability of making slides that are not completely a mess