←back to thread

210 points scapecast | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.434s | source
Show context
gjejcjekdnfnwja ◴[] No.45058702[source]
As an engineer, that slide looks completely reasonable to me. Its purpose was to communicate technical info, which it did adequately. Keep in mind that the subject matter is highly technical, given that we're literally talking about the Space Shuttle, and more than a high school level of reading comprehension is heavily implied. If the NASA personnel weren't competent enough to review technical data without a pithy summary, that's on them.
replies(12): >>45058746 #>>45058884 #>>45058926 #>>45058940 #>>45058950 #>>45058984 #>>45059072 #>>45059150 #>>45059232 #>>45061181 #>>45061650 #>>45069334 #
1. dooglius ◴[] No.45058940[source]
> which it did adequately

What makes you think this, given the subsequent events?

replies(1): >>45058963 #
2. gjejcjekdnfnwja ◴[] No.45058963[source]
That's a completely unremarkable slide in the aerospace industry. If there was a communication problem, it was with the NASA personnel not being able to operate in their own field.