←back to thread

440 points pseudolus | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.205s | source
Show context
kerblang ◴[] No.45057750[source]
High interest rates + tariff terror -> less investment -> less jobs

But let's blame AI

replies(19): >>45057802 #>>45057835 #>>45057896 #>>45058019 #>>45058030 #>>45058059 #>>45058070 #>>45058100 #>>45058231 #>>45058339 #>>45058429 #>>45058459 #>>45058497 #>>45058512 #>>45058575 #>>45058578 #>>45058645 #>>45058669 #>>45059576 #
an0malous ◴[] No.45057896[source]
Is there some central authority that’s telling people to blame this all on AI, or how is everyone reaching this conclusion and ignoring the other obvious factors you stated?
replies(2): >>45057954 #>>45061879 #
ajkjk ◴[] No.45057954[source]
It is in their interest to find explanations for reductions in labor that don't assign the blame to corporate greed.

For example, a call center might use the excuse of AI to fire a bunch of people. They would have liked to just arbitrarily fire people a few years ago, but if they did that people would notice the reduction in quality and perhaps realize it was done out of self-serving greed (executives get bigger bonuses / look better, etc). The AI excuse means that their service might be worse, perhaps inexcusably so, but no one is going to scrutinize it that closely because there is a palatable justification for why it was done.

This is certainly the type of effect I feel like underlies every story of AI firing I've heard about.

replies(2): >>45058513 #>>45058577 #
1. HumblyTossed ◴[] No.45058513[source]
> It is in their interest to find explanations for reductions in labor that don't assign the blame to corporate greed.

Exactly.