←back to thread

336 points dvrp | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.482s | source
Show context
jancsika ◴[] No.45058037[source]
> Ultimately, there was no long term negative impact of the events that transpired (except maybe for Alex, but I truly don't know) and I can now look back on it with amusement.

So a software guy who didn't understand people or banking opens an account at Chase. And a guy from Chase who didn't understand people or software calls him-- repeatedly over years-- and fails to ever connect on any human level whatsoever. Now when first guy withdraws millions from Chase, he unwittingly causes the second guy to lose his job. This means the the second guy isn't around to help the first guy when he needs him the most-- to help him navigate banking fraud on that same account.

This just seems tragic. Second guy's success as a banker and first guy's ease of mind as a customer were inextricably linked. Yet neither of them knew how to form the simple social bond of two 4 year-olds playing in the same sandbox.

Seriously-- how did Chase not hand the account to someone who could connect with this guy? For a multi-million dollar account this just doesn't pass the smell test.

replies(3): >>45058336 #>>45060000 #>>45062153 #
1. gck1 ◴[] No.45058336[source]
Banker was probably asked daily by his managers if the multi-million dollar client was happy and the banker probably always responded with-yes, very.
replies(2): >>45058895 #>>45060023 #
2. ◴[] No.45058895[source]
3. TZubiri ◴[] No.45060023[source]
I think daily is an overstatement, but it does sound like the guy took credit for some type of relationship that wasn't there, which is kind of unnecessary because maybe what he did was the right move, he gave the client exactly what he wanted.