Most active commenters
  • hashbig(3)

←back to thread

Claude Code Checkpoints

(claude-checkpoints.com)
184 points punnerud | 11 comments | | HN request time: 0.606s | source | bottom
1. hashbig ◴[] No.45054565[source]
Am I the only one who is getting tired of all these LLM generated landing pages with their hallmark indigo backgrounds/gradients, unnecessary and tasteless transitions, and meaningless marketing sell points?
replies(7): >>45054701 #>>45054913 #>>45055058 #>>45055314 #>>45055503 #>>45055893 #>>45055921 #
2. adventured ◴[] No.45054701[source]
I'm not sure what LLM has to do with it. A zillion boilerplate landing pages exist out there regardless and a lot of them look/behave just like that. Copying is copying.
replies(2): >>45054787 #>>45055196 #
3. hashbig ◴[] No.45054787[source]
LLMs are known to overuse purple:

https://x.com/adamwathan/status/1953510802159219096

https://ai-engineering-trend.medium.com/the-mystery-behind-a...

4. maddmann ◴[] No.45054913[source]
Yeah definitely feels vibe coded. I am so sick of the overuse of icons.
5. faxmeyourcode ◴[] No.45055058[source]
Plus the endless emojis and the cards with images completely missing from the bottom section where you're supposed to "see it in action."

It shows a lack of respect for yourself and your potential readers when you build something like this.

6. paulddraper ◴[] No.45055196[source]
Yeah. "LLM" and "Wordpress" is the same.
7. FergusArgyll ◴[] No.45055314[source]
It might be boring but it's easily understandable - I know where to click, where to look etc.

It's kind of a minimalism; it's not pleasing (to me) but it works

replies(1): >>45055771 #
8. swader999 ◴[] No.45055503[source]
Yes, I had to do a double take to realize this wasn't from anthropic.
9. hashbig ◴[] No.45055771[source]
I'd argue it's actually the exact opposite of minimalism. Just an abundance of colours, emojis, and marketing jargon. It shows a lack of taste.
10. dang ◴[] No.45055893[source]
Of course you're not the only one, but:

"Please don't complain about tangential annoyances—e.g. article or website formats, name collisions, or back-button breakage. They're too common to be interesting."

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

11. just_human ◴[] No.45055921[source]
I thought the same thing when I saw this! Great tool but clearly generated by LLM (Claude code?). It’s interesting that it’s so obvious. I wonder if human taste will evolve to dislike styles that are LLM generated.