←back to thread

167 points lemonlym | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
topaz0 ◴[] No.45053834[source]
Not that it would drastically change the conclusions, but do the numbers for "fund i" include the forms that say "fund ii" etc (by virtue of the fact that "fund i" is a substring of "fund ii" etc)?
replies(2): >>45053858 #>>45054126 #
1. pentamassiv ◴[] No.45053858[source]
It doesn't look like it does since "fund I" >> "fund II"
replies(1): >>45053945 #
2. FabHK ◴[] No.45053945[source]
As we'd expect if the numbers for "fund I" include both "fund I[^I]" and "fund II"?