←back to thread

203 points binwiederhier | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
Zr01 ◴[] No.45050665[source]
That's why I don't install updates, unless and until they've been proven not to break things. I miss the old days when software was expected to work out of the box and updates, on the rare occasions when they appeared, were actually useful.
replies(1): >>45050862 #
russfink ◴[] No.45050862[source]
I hope you are speaking with tongue in cheek. Security is the main reason to keep current with updates. They address various “CVE” reports and go beyond to patch things not reported by CVEs.
replies(7): >>45051311 #>>45051391 #>>45052013 #>>45053835 #>>45053884 #>>45056063 #>>45096143 #
1. worewood ◴[] No.45053835[source]
I think users wouldn't be so resistant to security updates of they were just that and not bundled with feature removal, unwanted new features, and other things.

Or if they were properly done. Example: Intel and the plundervolt vulnerability. To fix that they removed the ability for undervolting in ny laptop. If I don't use SGX there's no reason for the block. They could've restricted undervolting only when SGX is enabled but no, they had to "fix" it in the worst way possible.