←back to thread

The Deletion of Docker.io/Bitnami

(community.broadcom.com)
329 points zdkaster | 2 comments | 28 Aug 25 04:37 UTC | HN request time: 0.686s | source
Show context
morellonet ◴[28 Aug 25 12:56 UTC] No.45051606[source]▶
If you’re looking for an alternative here, we (the team that built Twistlock) launched Minimus a few months ago to provide near zero CVE images built continuously from source. We have long experience in this space (we even wrote NIST SP 800-190) and I’d love to talk if we could help anyone. We also have drop in replacement images and charts for Bitnami, as we describe here: https://www.minimus.io/post/the-bitnami-pricing-changes-what...

If anyone has tech questions about how it all works, tools we use, customer scenarios, etc I’d be happy to discuss.

replies(4): >>45052737 #>>45053063 #>>45053091 #>>45054839 #
1. mdaniel ◴[28 Aug 25 15:00 UTC] No.45053063[source]▶
Please offer an implementation of the docker-credential helper, just like chainguard does with docker-credential-cgr[1], and don't put throwaway text that says "docker supports credential stores, so good luck to you" on your website https://docs.minimus.io/foundations/authentication#using-a-c...

1: https://edu.chainguard.dev/chainguard/chainguard-images/chai...

replies(1): >>45054591 #
2. morellonet ◴[28 Aug 25 17:13 UTC] No.45054591[source]▶
It's on the roadmap :)

It's a good feature, just hasn't been prioritized so far because customers haven't really had trouble with the current basic approach.