←back to thread

The Deletion of Docker.io/Bitnami

(community.broadcom.com)
329 points zdkaster | 3 comments | 28 Aug 25 04:37 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
asmor ◴[28 Aug 25 07:28 UTC] No.45049447[source]▶
> However, in order to sustain and support the dedicated team of engineers who maintain and build new charts and images, a subscription will be required if an organization needs the images and charts built and hosted in an OCI registry for them.

This is such a naive take. Bitnami images were a sign of goodwill, a foot in the door at places were the hardened images were actually needed. They just couldn't compete with the better options on the market. This isn't a way to fix it, it's extortion. This is the same thing Terraform Cloud did, and I don't think that product is doing so hot.

> Essentially, Bitnami has been the Jenkins of the internet for many years, but this has become unsustainable.

It's other people's software, so it's very rich of Bitnami to accuse anyone of freeloading when their only contribution is adding config options to software that maybe corresponds to a level 2 on the OperatorFramework capability scale[1] - usually more of a 1.

[1]: https://operatorframework.io/operator-capabilities/

replies(11): >>45050005 #>>45050042 #>>45050416 #>>45050488 #>>45050688 #>>45050800 #>>45051410 #>>45052041 #>>45053279 #>>45054090 #>>45055791 #
kpcyrd ◴[28 Aug 25 11:02 UTC] No.45050688[source]▶
> it's extortion

That's a wild take for "somebody provided something for free but decided they don't want to anymore".

Sucks for you, looks like you have to do your job yourself now.

replies(2): >>45051741 #>>45055340 #
1. asmor ◴[28 Aug 25 13:11 UTC] No.45051741[source]▶
What do you mean, that's the business model more than half the VC-funded startups now. Provide something for free or near free, wait until your customer is dependent on you and/or consolidate into at least an oligopoly and then put the thumbscrews on.

I find that to be a pretty dishonest business model. I don't have any Bitnami images to replace, but I know a lot of people who do without ever having made that choice - and their bosses aren't going to pay Broadcom for the most part either. So you end up with overworked developers that now hate Broadcom and/or a whole lot of deployments that just break or never get updated. The number of people going "I can just switch over to the archive image, whatever" on the K8s subreddit alone is concerning.

replies(2): >>45052341 #>>45052927 #
2. ToucanLoucan ◴[28 Aug 25 14:06 UTC] No.45052341[source]▶
> What do you mean, that's the business model more than half the VC-funded startups now. Provide something for free or near free, wait until your customer is dependent on you and/or consolidate into at least an oligopoly and then put the thumbscrews on.

You skipped the part where you bankrupt your competition in the space who can't afford to hemorrhage cash they don't have like a VC-backed startup can, hoover up all the customers, then charge more than the old guard industry did in the first damn place for a worse version of the same service, while also paradoxically paying any workers needed to provide said service even less than they were making before.

3. conor- ◴[28 Aug 25 14:52 UTC] No.45052927[source]▶
The Bitnami images and helm charts are just convenient repackaging of things that are already freely (gratis) available. There's nothing stopping you from still deploying Kafka or Redis, etc. into your k8s cluster without using the Bitnami helm chart or building your own charts.

I think that's the point of above of "now you have to do your job" There's an evaluation that takes place when choosing to use something as an engineer, and the writing should have been on the wall the moment that Broadcom bought Bitrock to start planning to reduce dependency on those things.