←back to thread

The Deletion of Docker.io/Bitnami

(community.broadcom.com)
329 points zdkaster | 2 comments | 28 Aug 25 04:37 UTC | HN request time: 0.531s | source
Show context
MathiasPius ◴[28 Aug 25 05:39 UTC] No.45048784[source]▶
Between the VMware licensing changes and this, it looks like Broadcom is making a serious play at dethroning Oracle as the most evil software vendor.

It's a shame that competition for this position has been ramping up lately.

replies(7): >>45048813 #>>45049033 #>>45049641 #>>45050722 #>>45050761 #>>45050944 #>>45052286 #
martypitt ◴[28 Aug 25 08:01 UTC] No.45049641[source]▶
I'm still waiting to see how Broadcom will monetize the Spring ecosystem - which is widely used in almost all large enterprises.

Sadly, it feels like an inevitability at this point.

replies(5): >>45049775 #>>45050482 #>>45050791 #>>45051124 #>>45051187 #
1. uzername ◴[28 Aug 25 12:10 UTC] No.45051187[source]▶
My team is worried about that too. We've been a java and spring shop for years. We're looking at micronaut, it's similar enough.

When I had someone from another team take a look at broadcom and what they could do to spring, they said the licenses are permissive, it will be fine. Likely not that simple.

replies(1): >>45051645 #
2. martypitt ◴[28 Aug 25 13:00 UTC] No.45051645[source]▶
My guess will be:

- Shorter support windows, with longer support available for purchase (VMWare actually introduced this, but Broadcom can weaponize it)

- Then Enterprise Spring, which has additional features

- Then some other license shenaningans.

Hazelcast recently made the move where CVE security updates are only released into the OSS ecosystem quarterly - whereas the enterprise model gets them as soon as they're ready. In OSS, you have to rebuild and patch yourself.

That's a special kind of evil, which has Broadcom DNA all over it.