←back to thread

The Deletion of Docker.io/Bitnami

(community.broadcom.com)
329 points zdkaster | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
asmor ◴[] No.45049447[source]
> However, in order to sustain and support the dedicated team of engineers who maintain and build new charts and images, a subscription will be required if an organization needs the images and charts built and hosted in an OCI registry for them.

This is such a naive take. Bitnami images were a sign of goodwill, a foot in the door at places were the hardened images were actually needed. They just couldn't compete with the better options on the market. This isn't a way to fix it, it's extortion. This is the same thing Terraform Cloud did, and I don't think that product is doing so hot.

> Essentially, Bitnami has been the Jenkins of the internet for many years, but this has become unsustainable.

It's other people's software, so it's very rich of Bitnami to accuse anyone of freeloading when their only contribution is adding config options to software that maybe corresponds to a level 2 on the OperatorFramework capability scale[1] - usually more of a 1.

[1]: https://operatorframework.io/operator-capabilities/

replies(11): >>45050005 #>>45050042 #>>45050416 #>>45050488 #>>45050688 #>>45050800 #>>45051410 #>>45052041 #>>45053279 #>>45054090 #>>45055791 #
debarshri ◴[] No.45050005[source]
Building Infrastructure company is challenging in 2025. Previously, you would prioritize traction among developers over focusing on revenue.

But that does not work in 2025. You are expected to make money from the get-go and are left with only enterprise customers and boy, that category is hard, as everyone is competing for that slice.

replies(5): >>45050395 #>>45050503 #>>45050949 #>>45055404 #>>45055964 #
1. zaphar ◴[] No.45050949[source]
The problem I think is that all the easy infrastructure problems have been solved and the market is crowded with those solutions. Solving the hard problems is probably where you could have a viable business but I don't really see that many companies trying to solve those:

* Making mono-repos work for large companies.

* Mixed language builds are still a ci/cd unsolved problems for most companies.

* Testing strategies for Iac deployments.

And more that I won't bother to list here.

replies(1): >>45051078 #
2. pbronez ◴[] No.45051078[source]
This would make a great blog post: high hanging fruit of digital infrastructure