←back to thread

259 points the-mitr | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.413s | source
Show context
willgax ◴[] No.45048979[source]
An individual scientist/researcher (most of them) is in pursuit of truth. Nothing matters, and nothing should matter other than that. For future discoveries, we should make knowledge as accessible as possible. But when an organization forms, it competes for power and superiority. This results in discriminatory actions that cause the overall regression of collective innovation. It is sad to see this happen.
replies(4): >>45049123 #>>45049758 #>>45050279 #>>45050283 #
oneshtein ◴[] No.45050279[source]
Scientists can reproduce the findings and publish their own paper, instead of pirating someone else work.
replies(3): >>45050528 #>>45050926 #>>45051007 #
FabHK ◴[] No.45050528[source]
How do you reproduce a paper without having read it?
replies(1): >>45050863 #
1. oneshtein ◴[] No.45050863[source]
Obviously, someone must buy the paper, reproduce it, compare with original work, and then publish result for free. Same thing as for free software: someone must by a computer, write a software, then publish it on github.
replies(1): >>45051023 #
2. ardfard ◴[] No.45051023[source]
Publishing it on GitHub is optional; you can publish it anywhere accessible. And unlike these journals, it doesn't cost you anything to access free software. In fact, paywalling it makes it unfree.